CS‑45™: Our Digital Platform for Patient Centric Research


A proprietary, real-time platform to collect high-quality patient insights in collaboration with patient associations.

 

Patient Insights & Preferences

Case Study: Optimizing Treatment Positioning in Multiple Sclerosis

Objective

Understand patient preference trade-offs between efficacy, safety, and convenience to support launch positioning and lifecycle strategy.

 Study Design

  • Partner with MS patient associations in 2–3 EU countries
  • Cross-sectional CS-45 survey (n≈200–400 patients)
  • Modules:
    • treatment attributes (route, frequency, monitoring burden)
    • willingness to trade efficacy vs convenience
    • prior treatment experience

Key Outputs

  • % preference by treatment attribute (oral vs injectable vs infusion)
  • quantified trade-offs (e.g., % accepting lower efficacy for oral option)
  • segmentation (newly diagnosed vs experienced patients)

Pharma Value

  • Medical Affairs: patient-centered narrative in scientific exchange
  • Market Access: evidence supporting differentiated value beyond efficacy
  • Brand Team: refined positioning and messaging
 

Quality of Life & Mental Health

Case Study: Psychosocial Burden in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Objective (Pharma)

Quantify the full patient burden of metastatic breast cancer (mBC), beyond survival endpoints, to support:

  • value demonstration
  • medical education
  • patient-centric positioning

Study Design

  • Collaboration with metastatic breast cancer patient associations (2–3 EU countries)
  • Cross-sectional CS-45 survey (n≈150–300 patients)
  • Instruments:
    • EORTC QLQ-C30 (core cancer QoL)
    • EORTC QLQ-BR23 (breast cancer module)
    • PHQ-9 (depression)
    • GAD-7 (anxiety)
  • Additional modules:
    • emotional distress related to disease progression
    • treatment burden (hospital visits, side effects)
    • impact on family and social roles

Key Outputs

  • QoL scores across physical, emotional, and social domains
  • % of patients with moderate/severe depression and anxiety
  • correlation between treatment burden and QoL
  • subgroup insights (line of therapy, age, time since diagnosis)

Pharma Value

  • Medical Affairs
  • Enables more patient-centered scientific communication
  • Supports congress presentations and publications
  • HEOR / Market Access
  • Demonstrates burden beyond survival
  • Strengthens arguments around value of improved tolerability and QoL
  • Patient Engagement / Public Affairs
  • Supports collaboration with advocacy groups
  • Builds credibility around patient-centricity
 

Clinical & Symptom Outcomes

Case Study: Mapping Symptom Burden in Long COVID

Objective (Pharma / Medical)

Characterize real-world symptom patterns to inform clinical development and medical strategy.

Study Design

  • Partner with long COVID patient organizations
  • Survey captures:
    • fatigue, cognition, sleep, pain
    • symptom persistence and variability
  • n≈300–500 patients

Key Outputs

  • prevalence and severity distribution of key symptoms
  • identification of symptom clusters
  • patient-reported impact over time

Pharma Value

  • Clinical Development: prioritization of endpoints
  • Medical Affairs: evidence for unmet need
  • Pipeline Strategy: identification of target symptom domains
 

Functional Status & Daily Living

Case Study: Quantifying Productivity Loss in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective (Pharma / HEOR)

Demonstrate the functional and economic burden of RA beyond clinical measures.

Study Design

  • Collaboration with RA patient associations
  • Instruments:
    • HAQ (functional status)
    • WPAI (work productivity)
  • Additional questions:
    • daily activity limitations
    • caregiver dependence

Key Outputs

  • % of patients with impaired work capacity
  • absenteeism and presenteeism rates
  • daily activity impairment scores

Pharma Value

  • HEOR: inputs for cost-effectiveness models
  • Market Access: supports reimbursement discussions
  • Medical Affairs: broader disease burden narrative
 

Standardized & Comparable Outcomes

Case Study: Cross-Country Evidence Generation in Haemophilia

Objective (Pharma / Regional Medical)

Generate comparable, multi-country patient-reported evidence using a unified methodology.

Study Design

  • Same CS-45 protocol deployed in 3–4 EU countries
  • Use validated instrument (e.g., Haem-A-QoL)
  • Consistent sampling via national patient associations

Key Outputs

  • comparable QoL scores across countries
  • differences in treatment satisfaction and access
  • identification of regional disparities

Pharma Value

  • Regional Medical Teams: aligned evidence base
  • Market Access: country-specific insights within a common framework
  • Global Strategy: supports harmonized messaging